We
are experiencing a teacher shortage in North Dakota and across the nation. As
of October 5, 2015 there were 89 teacher openings across the state. Keep in
mind school started almost two months ago. This means that schools are either increasing
class sizes or are going without programs. There are less people going into the
education profession, which means we are graduating fewer teachers.
Teacher
salaries in North Dakota are near the bottom in comparison to the national
average. It is difficult in rural community that is not experiencing
substantial growth to remain competitive. The state funding formula favors a
growing a district. However, I do believe the issue is more complex than just
increasing pay for educators although it would certainly help. The following factors
should be considered if we are to fix the teacher shortage issues that
currently exist.
Respect
for the profession:
Teaching
is one of the most demanding professions in the world. Educators in the top
performing educational systems around the world are deeply respected. In fact
the highest achievers go into the education profession in top education
systems. In America, there is the perception that teaching is not difficult and
anybody could do it. Being an effective teacher is both art and science.
Teaching is difficult yet rewarding and it takes special dedicated individuals
to make the profession a career.
Support
our beginners:
We
have to do more to support our beginning teachers. Many teachers leave the
profession after only a few years. This is largely due to the level of support
they receive after they begin teaching. At Rugby, we assign mentors, provide
orientations, and use our professional learning communities to build their
support network. One of our school goals’ is to improve our retention of
beginning teachers.
Teacher
pipeline issues:
Is
higher education responding appropriately to our needs? Is it a teacher
shortage problem or a teacher pipeline issue? For years we have seen a plethora
of teachers in certain fields like elementary education while other fields
experienced shortages. Teacher preparation programs may need to redirect
students or place caps on certain education fields.
High
stakes accountability:
High
stakes testing and punitive punishments beat down educators. Standardized
assessments have their place in education and provide us with useful data. We
use this data and it helps us set school wide goals. However, this single
snapshot in time may not explain the whole picture. Each public school district
is required to make annual yearly progress based on these assessments. If we do
not meet certain proficiency levels we are placed on program improvement. While
on program improvement certain sanctions are placed on the school district.
These sanctions can be very frustrating and debilitating. There is no silver
bullet to immediately boost scores. Improving student achievement takes time
and the gains are incremental. What works for one student will not work for
another. Standardized assessments are necessary, but the sanctions imposed due
to low scores may cause many young people to choose a different career field.
Grow our own:
Do educators do a good enough job promoting
teaching as a career option? We are our own worst enemies at times. We should
be pushing our best and brightest into the profession. If we do not promote our profession we will continue
to see small applicant pools. This may impact our ability to fill positions
with high quality people.
Teaching cannot be seen as a backup career
choice for young people. We need to sell our profession and talk
positively about it!
Thanks for the insights. Todd Whitaker recently Tweeted this blog and I think it is insightful. http://growingleaders.com/blog/why-do-teachers-quit-how-can-we-prevent-it/
ReplyDeleteI would say that teacher autonomy is a big deal with teachers today also. I know of a few excellent younger teachers who left because of the reforms that took away much of their autonomy. This implies a lack of trust in teachers, which goes back to the respect point you bring up. I see quotes like "if you give students a rubric and get all of the same thing back, it wasn't a rubric, it was a recipe" from ed leaders, but I also see extra emphasis on "common" everything. I don't really see how those 2 align.
I also think that standardized testing has a purpose, if the test is valid and reliable. I hope that our state follows Connecticut and drops the Smarter Balance for juniors and just does the ACT. That will help with the problem of excessive testing. All of the problems with implementation of the tests and concerns about validity make me question how much emphasis we place on standardized testing, especially when the kids don't really take those tests seriously.
Anyways, I don't always agree with you but I appreciate your insights.
Thank you,
Matt Slocomb @mrslocomb
Thanks for the reply Matt. I would agree about the validity of the scores. I am concerned with the publication of our state's scores when many of us had all sorts of issues when administering the test. I like what Connecticut is doing and would support that.
ReplyDelete