Source: http://philmckinney.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/speech_bubble_reviews_noBackground.jpg
As a public school leader I have often thought about how
great it would be to have all students come to school ready to learn. If all students entering kindergarten were
exposed to literacy at an early age and all parents enforced this on a daily
basis our education system would be phenomenal.
In reality in a public school setting we will always have students at
different levels of understanding and skills.
I believe one of the major issues we have in our system is the lack of
understanding why some students are unprepared.
Understanding the various cultures and the clientele that attend the
school could allow us to have more success.
In What No Bedtime
Story Means, Shirly Brice Heath provides an excellent portrayal of three
communities that attend the same school system.
Maintown, Roadville and Trackton are the communities that attend the
school. All three have very different
cultures and have differing levels of success in the school system. Heath reminds us, “that the culture children
learn as they grow up is, in fact, “ways of taking” meaning from the
environment around them.” (Levinson, 2000, p. 169) Most educators and
successful people have grown up in literacy rich environments and I believe we
take it for granted that all family environments are like this. Our “ways of taking” meaning from the
environment around us differs when compared to other cultures, and this also
impacts how early literacy operates within a home. We need to first look at the cultures that
create the school community before we can begin to understand why students from
ethnic minority groups or students living in poverty struggle in schools. The focus of this writing will be centered on
how ones culture impacts the perception of early literacy within the home.
In Maintown, children are expected to join the literate
society. This neighborhood is well off
and consists mostly of middle class professional people. At a very early age typically around six
months children become indoctrinated with literacy. Every night they are read several bed time
stories, there is early questioning for comprehension and adults attempt to
connect stories to real life situations.
Preschool children accept book related activities as entertainment. Until they are school aged, children are prepared
for school. They will come into school
fully prepared to learn and will allow for a smooth transition into
school. These children are trained into
submission on how to listen and understand the appropriate cue when to respond
to questioning. More than likely all
children that come from this background will be successful and good at
school. (Levinson, 2000, pp. 171-174)
Roadville has some similarities and some
differences. Children are exposed to
literacy at an early age but in a different way. Their way of taking from the environment will
differ from a Maintown child. Reading
books will occur at similar times before nap and at bedtime. However, parents are less strict in terms of
forcing children into the literate society.
There is quite a bit more freedom, children are allowed to talk more and
participate more during long readings. “If
the content of the story plot seems too complicated for the child, the adult
tells the story in short, simple sentences.”
(Levinson, 2000, p. 177) This is very
different from how Maintown parents approach literacy. This approach would be viewed as less
rigorous and will have a negative impact on the child’s preparation for school activities. Roadville parents use less vocabulary and use
more directives rather than telling them how and why. In the early years of school Roadville
children are successful, but as they move to higher grades and as the readings
become more intense their success in school decreases. (Levinson, 2000, pp. 175-179)
In contrast with both Maintown and Roadville, Trackton has
a different culture that includes very little importance placed on early
literacy. They place more of an emphasis on the “oral
tradition” rather than the “literate tradition.” (Levinson, 2000, p. 170) There is no attempt
to interpret infant sounds into words or even later as a toddler. It is just considered “noise.” There are no
reading materials in the home other than a newspaper or a magazine. Older siblings from time to time may read to
the child but very little guidance is given from the parent. There is very little “parent talk” to the
child until they are old enough to communicate effectively with the
parent. Heath explains Trackton’s view
on parenting as, “they are “comers,” coming into their learning by experiencing
what knowing about things means.” (Levinson, 2000, p. 182) Another difference
within Trackton’s culture is that parents don’t believe it is their job to
prepare their child’s learning, they provide experiences and allow the child to
make sense of it. Storytelling is a very
important part of their culture, and is highly competitive and the most
aggressive children are able to get their story out. As you probably assumed, Trackton children
score in the lowest percentile on the Language Arts Assessment and are high
risk dropouts. (Levinson, 2000, pp. 180-184)
Maintown, Roadville and Trackton could exist in any
public school across the country. How
often do schools actually dig this deep to understand their clientele? I think it is important to understand the why
before we jump to conclusions. Educators
often blame parents for their children’s lack of preparation and often can’t
see that it is a cultural issue. Most educators come from Maintown and cannot
comprehend Trackton. There are so many
factors that go into play that will ultimately decide whether children succeed
or fail in schooling. We must as
educators understand how one’s culture impacts them as a learner. Then how do we differentiate to allow for
success? Culture is a difficult thing to
understand, and how do we get other cultures to understand the importance of early
literacy?
Source: Schooling the Symbolic Animal
No comments:
Post a Comment